Start here
Most of what parents hear about screens arrives as a number and a verdict. The number changes depending on who is talking, and the verdict is usually some version of “you are doing this wrong.”
Screens are part of nearly every home. Parents use them because that is the world we live in, because it is what we know, and sometimes simply because it is six in the evening and everyone is tired. None of that is a character flaw, and none of it is what this page is about.
One cartoon does not determine a child’s language development. The pattern around screens, and what they replace over time, matters more.
What the current guidance says
In 2026 the American Academy of Pediatrics revised its media guidance. The newer policy no longer treats a single age cutoff or a daily minute count as the whole answer.
For babies and toddlers the practical message is still a cautious one: limit screen use, put real-world play and responsive interaction first, choose good content, watch together when you can, and keep media from crowding out sleep, movement, reading, play and family time. Video calls are treated differently, because they allow interaction in both directions.
The questions the current framework asks are broader than a number. The AAP summarizes them as five Cs: the child in front of you and where they are developmentally, the content itself, whether screens are the main way a child is calmed, what media is crowding out of the day, and the communication around it.
Why a screen is different from a person
Infants, especially under about 18 months, generally learn less from prerecorded video than from live, responsive interaction. Researchers call this the transfer deficit: young children can have real difficulty taking something they saw on a screen and applying it in the real world.
The reason is not that screens are harmful in some mysterious way. It is that a person is responsive, and a recording cannot be.
| A recording | A person |
|---|---|
| Cannot follow your child’s gaze | Follows what your child notices |
| Cannot wait for a response | Pauses and responds |
| Cannot adapt its words | Repeats or says it a different way |
| Is the same for every child | Connects to this child’s real life |
Content and context still matter. High-quality content, and an adult who helps connect it to real life, can support learning, particularly as children get older. Even then, a recording cannot give the kind of response that comes from someone who can see what your child is doing and adjust in the moment.
Video calls are different
Video calls are different from prerecorded media because they can be live, responsive, and two-way. With a little help from an adult nearby they can support real interaction, though they are not identical to being in the same room.
Say who is on the screen. Repeat back what they said, in shorter words. Describe what is happening at your end so the person on the call can respond to it. Let your child show things to the camera, and give the other end time to react before you fill the silence.
For families keeping up a second language this is one of the more useful things a screen can do, because the person on the other end is a real speaker responding in real time. There is more on that in two languages at home.
The television nobody is watching
One of the clearest and easiest findings to act on concerns background television: a set left on in the room while everyone gets on with something else.
When a television is playing, adults say fewer words to their children and there are fewer back-and-forth exchanges between them. Children’s play also becomes shorter and less focused, even when they barely glance at the screen. In one study, twelve-, twenty-four- and thirty-six-month-olds looked at a background game show for only a few seconds at a time, and their play still fragmented.
The practical version: turning the television off when nobody is watching protects the openings for play and conversation. It is a simple change with good evidence behind it.
If screens are already part of your day
They are in most homes. None of this requires starting from zero.
Ask what the day looks like as a whole
Twenty minutes while you cook dinner may be meeting a real family need. The useful question is not whether that particular moment was ideal, but whether across the day your child still has room for play, movement, shared attention and conversation.
Watch with them when you can
A screen becomes more useful with a person beside it doing what the screen cannot: naming things, commenting, pausing, and connecting what is on the screen to your child’s real life. You do not have to do this every time, and nobody does.
Turn it off when nobody is watching
A simple, free change with clear evidence behind it. Quiet in the room makes room for talking in the room.
Protect the talk-rich parts of the day
Meals, the bath, getting dressed, the walk to daycare, the bedtime book. These are where the back-and-forth naturally lives, and keeping screens out of these particular moments does more than shave ten minutes off a daily total.
Notice the adult screen too
Checking your phone is part of real life, and this is not an instruction to stop. During a few protected routines, though, putting it away makes it easier to notice what your child is communicating, to wait, and to answer. The research on caregiver media use points the same way as the research on background television: it is the interruption to responding that matters.
Questions parents ask me
My toddler watched a lot of screens this year. Have I damaged their language?
A period of heavy screen use does not, on its own, tell us that your child’s language has been harmed. Most of this research describes associations across groups of children, and it cannot explain the development of one particular child.
This is the question I am asked most often, usually by a parent who is doing a great deal right and has been carrying it around for months. What the research can tell you is which direction to lean now, and leaning now is available to you.
Are educational apps and programs better?
Developmental readiness limits how much very young children learn from a screen. High-quality content and watching together can help, and the word “educational” on a box does not make a recording equivalent to live interaction. Content quality matters more as children get older.
Is a video call really different from other screen time?
It can be, and the difference is responsiveness. The person on the other end reacts to your child, waits for them, and responds to what your child actually did, which a recording cannot do.
How much screen time is too much before age two?
The 2026 guidance does not set one universal daily number for every child under two. It asks you to limit screen use broadly at this age, and to keep live interaction, play, sleep and movement first.
When families want a concrete boundary, the policy says it can be adapted to the family’s routine, and gives less than an hour a day as a possible range for toddlers and preschoolers. You may still meet the older advice built around 18 and 24 months, which came from the 2016 statement and has since been revised.
My child is not talking much and watches a lot of screens. Is that the cause?
It may be part of the picture, and it should not be assumed to be all of it. Screens are easy to blame, and blaming them can delay looking at everything else. If you are concerned about your child’s language, talk with their doctor or a speech-language pathologist rather than cutting screens and waiting. There is more in my toddler isn’t talking yet.
The full guide
This page answers one question. From Babbling Baby to Talking Toddler is the whole picture in order, with practical ways to build the back-and-forth that screens can displace, during the routines you already have. It is written for general parent education, and it does not replace an individual evaluation.
About the guideMore on early language
- My toddler isn’t talking yet, what late talking means, and when to ask for an evaluation.
- Two languages at home, how bilingualism affects language, and how to count words across languages.
- All the language tips.
About the author and sources
I am Michal Reshef, a speech-language pathologist licensed in Israel, working with young children and their families since 2010, and a mother of three. I write about early language development for parents, and I am the author of the picture book Moving Soon and the parents’ guide From Babbling Baby to Talking Toddler. I am not licensed in the United States.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Policy Statement, Pediatrics (2026). This is the current policy, and it replaces the 2016 statements.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Digital Ecosystems, Children, and Adolescents: Technical Report, Pediatrics (2026), the evidence review behind the policy, including the transfer deficit, the role of content and co-viewing, and why most of this research is correlational.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, The 5 Cs of Media Use: child, content, calm, crowding out, communication.
- American Academy of Pediatrics, Screen Time for Infants, on co-viewing, background television, and video calls.
- Christakis et al. (2009), “Audible television and decreased adult words, infant vocalizations, and conversational turns,” Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, on what a television playing in the room does to the talk in it.
- Schmidt, Pempek, Kirkorian, Lund & Anderson (2008), “The effects of background television on the toy play behavior of very young children,” Child Development 79(4), which found shorter and less focused play at 12, 24 and 36 months even though the children barely looked at the screen.
- The AAP’s Media and Young Minds (2016) is the source of the widely quoted 18-month and 18-to-24-month advice. It is included here as the previous guidance, since it has been revised.
Written and reviewed for clinical accuracy by Michal Reshef, a speech-language pathologist licensed in Israel. Last updated: September 2026.